Home
Blog
MDanko.Com - Harness Racing
Blog
Subscribe: Add to Google Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to My AOL


Sun, 03 Aug 2008
Sadinsky Panel Report

I've been re-reading the SadinskyPanelReport (SPR) and want to review some of its details DIRECTLY.

The executive summary on pages 3-6 is the obvious starting place.

[pag3-par3] the industry derives its income from 3 source:

  1. house take from wagering
  2. exporting ontario grown horses
  3. slots subsidy

i agree completely and would also include 4) private money invested and lost on horse racing ownership For example, Matts Sundin spends $100,000 a year on his race horses and they ONLY make $60,000 a year. Thats a net gain of $40,000 for the racing industry - money brought from hockey into horse racing.

[pag3-par4] the slots program is now 10 years old ... it was introduced without specific directions or benchmarks on how the money should to be used.

completely agree - no metrics of any kind, no accountability whatsoever, only "implied" good intentions that are NOT happening at most tracks.

[pag3-par5] OHRIA, the industry association, has failed to become an effective economic regulator for the industry due mostly to its inability to make decisions

agree completely, demonstrated lack of power to make changes and a thus no visionary leadership

[pag4-par1] HRO would take over the economic regulation of the industry including:

  • setting/approving race dates
  • developing a detailed industry strategic plan
  • administering province wide programs (HIP, Quarter horse development Plan)
  • what to do with tax reduction funds
  • branding and development of an industry-wide marketing strategy

    all very reasonable - perhaps not enough to turn things around ... so MORE should be added to this list. call this the MANDATE of the HRO

    The MOST important details in the report

    [pag4-par2] HROs ability to work in the best interests of the industry as a whole is perhaps the single most important element for the future success of the horse racing and breeding industry in Ontario.

    quite simply, HRO will be given the power and means to make changes. Changes can have good effects or bad effects - thats why CHANGE is so risky.

    I prefer a planned/managed/proactive approach to change (as would be tasked to HRO) instead of an unplanned, reactionary approach (make the best of whatever happens next approach that the industry has been using so far).

    [pag4-par4] The Panel supports a continued 20% slots subsidy but recommends that the program be adjusted to better meet the objectives of enhancing wagering on Ontario races and growing Ontario horses.

    well said, and ties DIRECTLY into [pag3-par3] profit streams. more detail is certainly needed but the recommendation is sound

    [pag4-par5] slot revenue be distributed as follows:

  • 25% to host track
  • 25% to local racing purses
  • 50% to HRO and pooled across the province to benefit the whole ontario racing industry

    this really SCARES people. Why should HRO get double what the horsemen or the track get ? It sends most horsemen into a ranting rage about gov't killing their livelihood and starving their families.

    Its important to understand it in CONTEXT. HRO will get 50% (not tricks there) but will be responsible for spending this money AS IT WAS INTENDED to be spent - and that is a good thing - and something that the current racing industry has NOT be able to achieve.

    The next few paragraphs better explains the impact of this HUGE change.

    [pag4-par5/6] HRO gets 1/2 of the slots revenue to be spent like this:

  • 10% on industry-wide initiatives like operating costs, branding and generic marketing of ONtario horse racing, R&D for new wagering products and technology use.
  • 90% on programs aimed at enhancing Ontario race wagering and exporting ON horses

    That's IMPORTANT. HRO gets 50% of the slots revenue but ONLY 10% of that (ie. 5% of the industries slots revenue) goes toward indirect costs. 90% of that money goes toward programs to DIRECTLY enhance horse racing's other 2 revenue streams.

    THIS IS GOODNESS. The report goes on to add detail about HOW hro will spend this 90%.

    [pag4-par7] 3 programs to enhance ontario wagering product and export of ontario grown horses:

    1. funding restricted races for Ontario grown horses
    2. purse money bonuses to owners/breeders of ontario grown horses
    3. giving money to the poor tracks and purses to keep the provincial playing field more level

    Wow, 90% of the slots revenue taken by HRO comes back to the tracks/horsemen BUT in planned ways. programs managed to enhance the racing industry and our business revenue streams. This is good.

    [pag5-par2] these 3 programs would flow most of the slot revenue back to racetracks and racing purses but are incentive based available for tracks to grow their wagering product on live racing.

    Of course still needs MORE details but it sounds like the programs are aiming money in the right directions.

  • Posted 11:29

    No comments


    Post a Comment: